Protect the original from silent alteration.
Verification checks the artifact’s binding and supported proof. A changed file cannot stand in for the verified original when it breaks that proof.
Faster review starts with a stronger record.
Move the case forward.Keep every source in reach.
When a case changes hands, its proof should travel with the evidence. Receiz preserves verifiable originals and their history, so authorized reviewers can check held records independently of the originating case system.
For financial-crime operations, fraud and disputes teams, investigations, and assurance leaders.
THE RECORD CARRIES FORWARD
One case. Evidence you can trace.
- 01Original source recordsPreserve the exact original
- 02Review & supporting evidenceInspect the supporting sources
- 03Decision & retained historyRetain verified additions
The file carries the proof.
The next team can verify it.
Exact source filesVerified historyIndependent verificationExplicit access boundaries
Keep the source. Reduce the retrieval dependency.
Give the next authorized reviewer a verifiable original. Checking its proof does not require the originating case system to confirm it again, so access to that system need not become a condition of verifying evidence already held.
THE SOURCE
A proof object carries its own record.
Each proof object is the append-only database for its identity and governed history. Verified additions extend that history. Servers and databases may transport, index and replicate the objects; they do not replace their proof authority.
- Hold the complete original
- Verify its enclosing proof
- Inspect its carried record
Check held proof without a live database lookup.
With the complete artifact and canonical verifier resources, offline verification establishes its proof without asking the originating service to confirm it.
Design the handoff around what is needed.
Choose the complete proof objects each authorized participant receives. A scoped workflow can reduce repeated collection and unnecessary copies without making one party custodian of everyone’s complete history.
An investigator hands selected source objects to a reviewer. The reviewer verifies the held originals and inspects their evidence. The institution retains responsibility for the case conclusion and the records its process requires.
FROM SOURCE AUTHORITY TO A DECISION YOU CAN INSPECTIntelligence you can trace.
Intelligence you can trace.
Decisions you can inspect.
A connected view helps people understand the work. Receiz keeps the evidence beneath that understanding independently checkable: the original carries proof, supported tools project its content, and the responsible person or organization decides what to do.
- PreserveKeep the exact source as a sealed proof object.
- VerifyCheck the enclosing artifact before relying on its carried content.
- UnderstandInspect selected evidence through compatible readers, Mind or AI tools.
- DecideKeep the authorized decision connected to its supporting sources.
- Carry forwardRetain the originals and verified additions for the next review.
For investigations and assurance, distinguish the original source, the analyst’s observation and the institution’s conclusion. Carry the relevant evidence through escalation and subsequent review.
End-to-end organizational workflows require qualified source connectors, permissions, decision owners and operational actions. Installing the tools does not automatically connect every system or seal every AI response. Measure evidence preparation, repeated source requests and time to reconstruct the decision basis.
What protects the data—and what does the workflow still govern?
Integrity: sealed proof makes the original checkable. It does not by itself establish the truth of every factual claim in the content.
Confidentiality: who can read a record depends on its actual encryption, access and sharing controls. Sealing alone does not make content private, and sharing a readable original shares its carried content.
Custody: define source selection, permissions, retention and recipient responsibilities. Independent verification does not remove records you must retain or deployment-specific data obligations.
Continuity: offline verification checks the held artifact and its carried history. Discovering later additions and using connected services retain their own network and access requirements.
The next decision starts
with the work already done.
Recover investigation capacity.
Keep the exact evidence behind a case available through review handoffs. Reduce repeated requests for files already collected and preserved.
More time assessing the case. Less time rebuilding it.Make review and challenge easier.
Give the next reviewer the source behind an observation or conclusion. Preserve additions without replacing the earlier record.
Clearer evidence gaps. More efficient quality review.Retain a checkable record.
Carry sealed proof objects beyond a particular dashboard or session. Independently verify the held files and inspect their carried history.
Evidence continuity through escalation and later review.From initial review to a decision that can be inspected.
Start with one evidence-heavy investigation or dispute workflow. Keep the people making the decision connected to the sources behind it.
- 01A stable evidence foundation
Preserve the selected sources
Take the authorized records selected for the case and preserve their exact bytes as proof objects. Retain the source context needed for review.
- 02An inspectable basis for analysis
Build a traceable review
Associate permitted supporting material and observations with their originals. Keep recorded evidence distinct from an analyst’s interpretation.
- 03A review that can continue
Hand off with the evidence
Give the next authorized reviewer the same source objects and supported verified history. Record new findings as additions to the case workflow.
- 04A decision connected to its sources
Preserve the decision record
The responsible team assesses the facts and makes the decision in its governed process. Retain its basis and exact supporting files for subsequent review.
Receiz proof objects, identity continuity and independent verification carry this workflow. Configure source connections, permissions and decision responsibilities for your organization.
Choose the handoff
worth improving first.
Financial-crime investigations
Preserve the documents and source evidence selected for a review. Carry the record through investigator, quality-review and escalation handoffs.
Explore evidence-grounded understandingFraud & payment disputes
Bring original delivery, acceptance and supporting records into the dispute review. Inspect the evidence behind a contested event.
Explore delivery proofInternal assurance & audit review
Retain exact proof files, inspect their provenance and test independent verification. Review the record without depending on a screenshot of the originating system.
Inspect the proof foundationA working foundationProof that travels
Proof that travels
with the original.
Receiz seals exact source files into proof objects. Canonical verification checks the enclosing artifact. Identity, provenance, custody and verified history retain their own implemented boundaries.
Mind and AI tools help people inspect and work with supported evidence. Their interpretations remain connected to the source; they cannot replace it.
Measure the work recovered.
Agree a baseline, run one bounded workflow, and compare the result. Separate time recovered from cash expenditure actually avoided.
Evidence preparation time
BASELINE
Analyst time spent finding, requesting and organizing the required source files.
PILOT MEASURE
Compare like-for-like cases, source coverage and evidence requirements.
Review returns
BASELINE
Cases returned for missing evidence, unclear source lineage or incomplete handoffs.
PILOT MEASURE
Track return reasons and resolution time separately from case complexity.
Time to reconstruct a decision
BASELINE
Time for an authorized second reviewer to locate the decision basis and its originals.
PILOT MEASURE
Run an independent sample review using the retained proof objects.
Measurement plan, not a promised result. Compare equivalent work and include integration, training, review and operating costs.
A review your stakeholders
can make together.
Data & access
Agree the case data, authorized roles, retention rules, permitted sharing and deployment environment. Use synthetic or approved demonstration material for the initial assessment.
Workflow & integration
Name the case system, source connectors, handoff steps and decision owners. Qualify exact formats and permissions; access to a system does not follow from installing Receiz.
Assurance & responsibility
Review security, privacy, operating controls and the evidence behind them. Agree responsibilities, acceptance criteria and required institutional approvals before deployment.
Deployment scope and assurance
Receiz preserves and verifies proof objects. Case conclusions remain the responsibility of the authorized institution. This page does not claim a shipped transaction-monitoring or sanctions-screening engine, automatic regulatory filing, or a compliance certification.
Bring one case workflow where gathering evidence consumes the review.
We will map the sources, the review steps, the deployment requirements and the measurable outcome with you. Start with an approved example and an operational owner.
Assessment → agreed scope → qualified deployment → measured review.
Open the scheduling page